![]() However, there’s a very effective way to avoid all these dangers and answer the question of whether the service can be trusted once and for all: end-to-end encryption. Or, even if we assume they’re honest to the core and have no desire to stick their noses into users’ data, where’s the guarantee that, if the service is one day sold, the next owners would be as honest? And then of course the service could get hacked, in which case the hackers themselves would gain access to correspondence. For example, the owners of the service themselves may turn out to be overly curious or greedy. Here’s why: if not only messaging participants but also the service has access to chats, then that creates additional risks. However, that’s not enough to consider a system secure, since it does not guarantee total message security. That’s the absolute minimum that any messenger should provide. The first thing to realize is that almost all modern messengers long ago switched to encrypted data exchange between user devices and servers. To start with, let’s figure out how a secure messenger works. Let’s take a look at some rather dubious features in both the messenger’s interface and general logic that make it less secure than is commonly believed. ![]() ![]() But in practice that’s not entirely true: the reality is that Telegram has a number of quirks that make protecting your messages a little tricky, and it’s got nothing to do with the complexities of cryptography, but with much more prosaic stuff. Telegram’s developers position their product as safe and protected. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |